Friday, August 7, 2020

Mississippi COVID-19 Pre-Existing Disease

 by Jim West (please share and cite)

Mississippi (the COVID-19 hotspot, as of 8/7/2020)
 
44% of deaths are in Long Term Care, can be seen in  this chart of death statistics in  Mississippi, truncated and annotated here.
 
 
Most of the other 56% are likely suffering pre-existing diseases. The CDC has stated, generally,
The percentage of COVID-19 patients with at least one underlying health condition or risk factor was higher among those requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission (78%) and those requiring hospitalization without ICU admission (71%). [CDC]
Thus, COVID-19 is "helping" the economy by ousting vegetative vulnerable people from the planet.
 
Balance is the problem. "COVID-19" (as pollution and malpractice) is creating even more vegetables for the next season's harvest.

Yet, balance is always optimized. The challenge for global management: How to oust vegetable humans (increase Darwinian pressure) without creating too many more vegetables. This is a known toxicological problem for the required poisoning of human society -- to maintain "hormesis". 

Yes, poisoning is required according to global human management protocol. It is not just greedy industry making mistakes. So says Yuval Harari, elite historian.

This hormetic system for human society is in parallel with agricultural protocols. It is a long ongoing agenda, to optimize the global economic metabolism, and is hidden by journalism.

See how toxicologists explain required social poisoning: "Rationale for Industrial Poisoning".

__________________________

Disclaimer: The author is not an authority or professional. For medical advice, see a trusted professional without delay. All statements are hypotheses for discussion. Constructive criticism is welcome.

Fair Use Act Disclaimer.
This site is for discussion purposes only.
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

Intellectual Property Rights
The intellectual property aggregated and redistributed in this site is for educational use only and is considered protected by standards of fair use. Intellectual property owners have been cited where possible. Original material produced for this site is copyright Jim West / harvoa, All rights reserved.

Please support this work by sharing, buying booksor donating.

Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Virology: Fake Science

by Jim West (please share and cite)

Virology is at the root of much unsupported Medical propaganda with regard to disease causation and vaccination. 

Due to Medicine's acknowledged bad reputation, it is unwise to accept medical announcements (press releases) without first running them through a critical gauntlet.

Therefore, proof of virus existence and character should always be required from the claimers of viruses -- before going into the related topics, i.e., before going out on the thin limbs, leaves and flowers of a tenuous rootless tree.

This will get you nowhere with a doctor or judge, as they represent authority over science, even if irrational.

Nevertheless, virus criticism is essential for an honest conversation, to keep the mind sharp.

Virology: Two Achilles Heels

1) Isolation of viruses is not actually achieved, as it is claimed. Critical examples are poliovirus and HIV.

2) Toxicology is missing. That is, the toxic effects of antibiotics used in virological studies are not discounted. The clinical diagnoses and the epidemiology avoid environmental toxicology.

Going into detail

1) Virus Isolation

"Isolation" of viruses has always been broadcasted as a great achievement, because it intuitively conveys a sense of total dominance and understanding of the so-called virus. 

Example, poliovirus:


That famous "isolation of poliovirus" in 1909, by Landsteiner and Popper, consisted of the injection of emulsified extract of spinal cord taken from one paralyzed human child into two monkeys. The monkeys became ill, and one died. This illness was interpreted as "polio", "infection" and by subsequent journalists and scientists, "virus isolation".

No control group existed (no comparison with injections from healthy human spinal cord). No toxicology was discounted for the ill child during his diagnosis. Toxic factors are not discounted in polio epidemiology generally -- despite toxic factors being extremely obvious.

An second attempt was made, to infect other healthy monkeys from the ill monkeys, and the result was failure.
From the spinal cord of this monkey inoculations were made into two other monkeys with negative results.
This attempt was within the same animal specie (monkey to monkey, not human to monkey) and it still failed. 

Thus, though the study actually proves that "polio" is not contagious, it goes down in history as a great achievement of "virus isolation", proving discovery of poliovirus as cause.

Derived from inorganic chemistry

The term "isolation" is derived from the true success of inorganic chemistry (non-biological chemistry).
 
Example: H2O can be split into two isolates, i.e., two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom, through electrolysis. Endless types of experiments can then be run on each of these isolates to determine their properties, density, weight, etc. Examples: A) Fill a balloon with hydrogen and watch it rise into the sky. It must a low density element. B) These isolates can be reacted with each other again to produce H2O again.  D) The proportions  of H2O can be ascertained. E) They can be reacted individually with metals to form metal oxides and hydrides, e.g., rust was determined to be iron oxide.

Children can do such experiments in the kitchen. 

Hurrah for Science!
 
Clever virologists faked this method and its terminology. They did this by (in practice) redefining the word "isolate" to mean  "mixture", the opposite of its actual meaning.

In practice, "virus isolates" are complex mixtures of biological matter, impossible to understand, except as a confused mess.

The Perth Group, essentially, is saying this, and so are biochemists Howard Urnovitz PhD, and Stefan Lanka PhD. The virus paradigm promoter, PhD, Judy Mikovitz admitted this in her interview with David Crowe, the medical dissident.

Virus "isolates" are more "mixed" than anything on the planet, the result of high-speed blending of diseased tissue, to break down its components into a blended mess. What freaky hormones are generated by cells in the process of disintegrating them in the blender? And putting that mess into a centrifuge at 150,000G for 45 minutes?

A clear liquid is extracted off the top of the mess, by use of the centrifuge. This "supernatant" is sometimes filtered to provide what is assumed to be the "isolate", i.e., a "virus strain". But if 150,000G was required to "isolate" the "virus", then maybe it wasn't really isolated. It was much more likely split off of some essential interlinked component.

Electron microscopy confirms a mixture, not an isolate of anything.

The electron microscope photos are minute cherry-picked areas of the "isolate", found through a meticulous process, then used to promote the idea of an imagined "virus isolate". Many images are modified or computer generated images. Photos are shown without a referenced study. The data doesn't support the virus model, so the data is interpreted to fit the model.

Another problem is that to see anything under an electron microscope, the stuff must be prepared, which means kill it, dehydrate it, slice it, destroy it with splattered molten gold and toxic chemicals. Thus electron microscopy is not seeing the real thing.

The highly awarded Harold Hillman (PhD Biochemistry) clearly demonstrated this, and thereby lost his tenured professorship. Among other positions, he was the director of the neurobiology laboratory at London University. His films are on YouTube. His summary paper is here.
 
In 2005, officials announced that the words "isolation" and "isolate", "have no specific definition". Apparently this was because The Perth Group and others were so successful in unveiling the false claims of virus isolation. Virus believers continue to madly attack Perth ad hominem, while denying Perth rebuttal. An example is Wikipedia.

The victory call, "Isolation achieved!", has now been replaced with a new routine of propaganda, whereby it is claimed that isolation is not necessary. However, when I asked how this could be, the claimer ran away. 

It's logical to expect that things must be viewed as separate entities in order to understand their functions. If you are always experimenting with a soup of A+B+C+D, then you would never know which of those things in the soup was the real culprit. And that is virology.

Even in the unlikely event that viruses were proven to exist and found to be predatory sub-microbes, that would only be a laboratory artifact, because the laboratory scenario is highly artificial, and the "diseases" produced, in lab mice and cell lines, generally do not resemble the disease being studied.
...the highly specialized, neurotropically fixed virus, which has been maintained in the past by intracerebral passage in rhesus monkeys, is more likely a laboratory artifact... Claus W. Jungeblut, PhD
Missing is a simple commonsense study -- Take 10,000 healthy mice and drop a few "infected" mice in their midst and watch the epidemic spread without a vaccine, without limits. 

That study is not done because it would disprove germ theory.

Yet there are a few exceptions. A study was conducted for influenza, an extensive study using human subjects. Result: "Virus" influenza is not an infectious disease.

2) Toxicology Avoided

Missing is toxicology in virology, in epidemiology, and in clinical diagnostics.

The following is extracted from my measles research.

Lanka notes the lack of evidence for measles virus. He specifically critiques the work of virologist John F. Enders, PhD. [Article 2015] [Article 2001] [Interview 2018] [Virology details 2/2017, German Language]

Lanka:
The first paper was published in 1954 by Enders et al... Enders... cut down dramatically on the nutrient solution and added cell-destroying antibiotics to the cell culture before introducing the allegedly infected fluid. The subsequent dying of the cells was then misinterpreted as presence and also isolation of the measles virus. No control experiments were performed to exclude the possibility that it was the deprivation of nutrients as well as the antibiotics which led to the cytopathic effects.
And a few notes from me on the fakery of virus isolation by Enders...

John Enders is also falsely credited for isolating the poliovirus, according to a critical review by journalist Neenyah Ostrom, on the authority of biochemist Howard Urnovitz, PhD. [Ref]

[P]oliovirus was not actually isolated by these investigators, either. They successfully grew "filterable agents," which they assumed to be poliovirus, in human embryonic tissues.

Enders' fame as "The Father of Modern Vaccines" is perhaps due to his tremendous inheritance and elite membership in Yale's wealthiest secret society. No joke. [Ref]

How to argue "no virus"

Keep the burden of proof on the claimers (of virus existence).

They claim to know, and perhaps (unlikely) they do. So we want to learn.

Therefore, respect their wisdom, then ask one question and two followups.

1) What seminal study describes the discovery of said virus? The first, original study which describes discovery. (The earlier the study, the less complicated the BS. Later studies are often based on the original study, so nip it all at the root, the original study.)

a) What text in this study describes the isolation of the virus? (This is to ensure that they have  actually read more than the title, and to save yourself time reading BS.)

b) What text in this study describes the process of discounting toxicological factors? (See Lanka above on this.)

The claimers should balk. End of confrontation.

Likely they have not read the content of their prized study, and they are assuming you will be bluffed and in awe, like them.

It may be inconceivable to them that such sophisticated tech and writing could be misleading. Often they are in love with the semantic and tech sophistication for which money has paid, and they might not realize this.

In a sense, logic is the ultimate power, but no matter how eloquent, it requires valid data. It is not without political hazards. Logic can only be presented at diplomatically safe times and places. Diplomacy is superior, and another area of logic, which can trump technical flash.

It is possible that a study will outright lie and invent data, but usually, in order to gain the support of a team of science techies, the study contains white lies. Techies will work under the banner of white lies, secure that they will not appear fraudulent. 

The study will be peer-reviewed and published, and thereby gaining the prestige of honesty. However, even the senior editors of prominent Medical science publications have decried medical science in general as entering the dark age of fraud (as if it were not always the case). Jon Rappaport documents this.

If for some reason you must read the study, yet you lack medical tech language, you can parse out the language and learn, or read and note the lack of actual isolation. 

Or you can merely search for the word "toxicology" or similar words. This essential topic is very unlikely to be found in the study.

Usually virus fanatics present an article or review of studies, in which case you would reply, "A scientific study is required, not journalism."

Summary (in other words)

To critique a “virus”, do not be awed by the technology and language.

Do not argue. Just require proper documentation from the virus fan.

That is --

Always remember that the burden of proof is on them, those who make the claims. If you argue, then you will be required to "prove" your assertion, and from a philosophical view, proof is nearly impossible for anything, and your virus fan will pedantically jump on you.

Merely ask one question, and add two followups.

    1) What is the study that first claimed discovery of said virus?

         a) What text in the study describes isolation of the virus?

They can’t rebut because isolation doesn’t actually occur. The word “isolate” is (in virology practice) redefined as “mixture”. What is called a "virus strain" is the result of blending diseased tissue at high speed for 45 minutes. Obviously that is not an "isolate".

         b) What text in the study describes the process of discounting toxicological factors?

This is necessary, because in our industrial world, poisons are an obvious potential threat. The Medicos cannot answer, because their entire purpose is to distract you away from any toxicological perception.

Examples of virus criticism

Simplest argument: Omitted toxicology invalidates virology
https://harvoa-med.blogspot.com/2020/10/cvnot.html

"Canadians isolate COVID-19 virus!"

COVID-19 is an environmental and malpractice phenomena.


__________________________

Disclaimer: The author is not an authority or professional. For medical advice, see a trusted professional without delay. All statements are hypotheses for discussion. Constructive criticism is welcome.

Fair Use Act Disclaimer.
This site is for discussion purposes only.
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

Intellectual Property Rights
The intellectual property aggregated and redistributed in this site is for educational use only and is considered protected by standards of fair use. Intellectual property owners have been cited where possible. Original material produced for this site is copyright Jim West / harvoa, All rights reserved.

Please support this work by sharing, buying booksor donating.


Monday, August 3, 2020

COVID Anecdotes

by Jim West (please share and cite)

The Violent MASKER, again, 8/1/2020

11am. I'm looking for a public area with low EMF, using the the am radio test. I forgot to put on my mask.

I get about six feet from a man sitting on a bench. 

Man: "Stay away from me. Social distance."

I see he has no mask. "You should be wearing a mask. It's the law."

Man: "I don't want to hear your bullshit!" I realize this is the same rude man I had met a few weeks earlier. [See "Violent MASKER" below]

Me: "You already have it."

The man lurches forward violently as if to attack me. Then he settles back into his bench.

I stand unaffected with a smile. "How strange," and I walk away.

I reflect, and remind myself that it is not good to make enemies.


The Violent MASKER, 7/5/2020

A mask mandate has been declared in my city.

I'm sitting on a park bench at 8:30am, and nobody is near. A man (age ~65) walks over and sits 15 feet away. 

Man: "Are you aware that a mask must be worn in public space?"

Me: I reach for my mask and begin putting it on. "Yes... but..."

Man: "I don't want to hear your bullshit!"

Me: "Yet, I'd like to hear yours." Man walks off in a huff, and apparently calls the police. Five minutes later a cop car shows up and parks, politely positioned towards me. I walk towards the cop car and veer past.

Obsessive Maskers 7/20/2020

At 3am when the city is abandoned, I see a single person walking down the street in the dark, walking out of the city, wearing a COVID mask.

A person is driving a car, windows rolled up, A/C on, wearing a mask.

Solitary people are wearing masks with pride, as if they are wearing a crisp military uniform, as if they are a member of a cult, making a brave statement.

Posters 7/10/2020

Poster says "We are a community that cares. Please respect our wishes and wear a mask."

Poster says: "Masks are mandated. It's the law. Mask up buttercup!"

After a few weeks, these posters are being torn down.

The Blunt Believer, 6/5/2020

I'm alone in a park, nobody near. An acquaintance walks up to say hi.

Acq: "You know that this city is experiencing a dramatic rise in COVID cases?"

Me: "Cases are undefined. Testing is ramping up and there is a natural reflection of testing. And a better marker is deaths. COVID is known to be related to air pollution, and we have little air pollution here."

Acq: Insultingly, "You're one of those people who goes on the Internet and researches stuff."

I reflect a dismay. My acquaintance feels bad. He walks away.

__________________________

Disclaimer: The author is not an authority or professional. For medical advice, see a trusted professional without delay. All statements are hypotheses for discussion. Constructive criticism is welcome.

Fair Use Act Disclaimer.
This site is for discussion purposes only.
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

Intellectual Property Rights
The intellectual property aggregated and redistributed in this site is for educational use only and is considered protected by standards of fair use. Intellectual property owners have been cited where possible. Original material produced for this site is copyright Jim West / harvoa, All rights reserved.

Please support this work by sharing, buying booksor donating.








Saturday, August 1, 2020

NYC Water

by Jim West (please share and cite)

New York City claims to have a multi-billion $ filtration system. [Ref]
 
What good is that filtration system when there are so many ways that NYC water can be contaminated as it travels through local pipeline systems that run through the City's polluted earth, before it gets to the customer?
 
NYC brags that its water is perfect yet it does not warn its population that its water is piped through NYC toxic earth on its way to the consumer. 

These spill poisons can find their way into the City water pipes and joints. In the earth, oscillating pressure and shock waves work toxic plumes into the crevices and imperfections of the pipe system. Human error also causes water toxicity.

Industrial Spills (EPA database)


 
Thus water should be filtered or distilled before final use. This can only be done effectively by the customer, or building management.
 
Toxic Dumping

The City dumps several toxic chemicals into the water supply, e.g., fluoride, chlorine, etc. It ignores these as it brags about its water purity. 

The City ignores chemical toxicity if it is below the declared EPA hazard threshold. Even if the combined toxicity level (of several compounds) exceeds a single compound's toxicity level.

Perhaps the City should not be filtering and treating and just get out of the way and save our tax money. 

It should warn citizens that they should be filter their own water. They must do this even with the best filtering and treatment plans, due to the unpredictable potential for human disaster. But gov cannot admit fault. It pays billions to maintain images of faith in central power.

We must filter or distill our water supply individually.

My method

Distill water with a pinch of sodium carbonate ("washing soda" at the local market), to react with petrochemicals that would otherwise vaporize and go with the distiller's output and condense into the receiving container. The reaction products then have a higher boiling point. By this I avoid the hassle of activated carbon filters.

This will not work for all scenarios, all contaminants. 

People have long used sodium bicarbonate ("baking soda") to remove (by reaction) organic odor, and washing soda is the mild sister compound of sodium carbonate. 

Washing soda can be made from bicarbonate of soda by heating at high temp in the stove, driving out CO2. This explains how people can clean an oven by merely painting baking soda onto the inner stove, and heating.
__________________________

Disclaimer: The author is not an authority or professional. For medical advice, see a trusted professional without delay. All statements are hypotheses for discussion. Constructive criticism is welcome.

Fair Use Act Disclaimer.
This site is for discussion purposes only.
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

Intellectual Property Rights
The intellectual property aggregated and redistributed in this site is for educational use only and is considered protected by standards of fair use. Intellectual property owners have been cited where possible. Original material produced for this site is copyright Jim West / harvoa, All rights reserved.

Please support this work by sharing, buying booksor donating.

Friday, July 17, 2020

EMF Quick Intro

by Jim West (please share and cite)

NIH study, Elmas (2016), warns:
…electronic devices generating EMFs should be approached with caution.
Journal of Microscopy - Kivrak (2017)
[EMF]… eventually leading to various diseases, including sleep disorder, arthrosclerosis, loss of appetite, diabetes, dizziness, rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular disease, nausea and stroke.
WHO lists some EMF symptoms
…symptoms (redness, tingling, and burning sensations) as well as neurasthenic and vegetative symptoms (fatigue, tiredness, concentration difficulties, dizziness, nausea, heart palpitation, and digestive disturbances). [Cancer, lymphoma, etc, should also be listed.]
WHO INSTRUCTS PHYSICIANS TO IGNORE EMF
Physicians: Treatment of affected individuals should focus on the health symptoms and the clinical picture, and not on the person's perceived need for reducing or eliminating EMF in the workplace or home.
"Treatment" means avoidance of environmental causation such as EMF. It can include an evaluation  which includes anesthesia, MRI and analysis of insomnia cause. Cause can be asserted as "dysfunctional sleep center mechanisms". Dangerous pharmaceuticals can be prescribed. If the patient mentions "EMF", they can be recorded as a psychological case.
 
YOUR OWN PROOF THAT EMF IS A HEALTH FACTOR

If you don't trust studies, then do your own proof. If you suffer insomnia or nervousness (first symptoms), then unplug (not turn off) all EMF devices before sleeping. If possible, turn off house breaker switches. Calm and sleep should improve greatly -- unless there remains an unknown EMF source or if you are on drugs (any drug, caffeine, nicotine, alcohol, etc). If concerned about the breaker switch being off, e.g, concerned about the refrigerator losing its cool, then keep a pot of water in the freezer as a BTU buffer.

Further reading






Notes

EMF = Electromagnetic Fields (WiFi, AM, FM, power cables, dimmer switches, power cables, fluorescent lights, transformers for LED lights, etc)
NIH = National Institutes of Health
WHO = World Health Organization

Sources


__________________________

Disclaimer: The author is not an authority or professional. For medical advice, see a trusted professional without delay. All statements are hypotheses for discussion. Constructive criticism is welcome.

Fair Use Act Disclaimer.
This site is for discussion purposes only.
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

Intellectual Property Rights
The intellectual property aggregated and redistributed in this site is for educational use only and is considered protected by standards of fair use. Intellectual property owners have been cited where possible. Original material produced for this site is copyright Jim West / harvoa, All rights reserved.

Please support this work by sharing, buying booksor donating.

Thursday, July 16, 2020

Zach Bush, MD and Del Bigtree on COVID-19

by Jim West (please share and cite)

I separate myself from Zach Bush, MD and Del Bigtree, on the issue of coronavirus and pollution.

Coronavirus Epicenter Causation

Zach Bush & Del Bigtree

Jim West

Coronavirus is causing morbidity and mortality.

No documentation demonstrates the existence of a coronavirus . This argument is slam-dunk.

The coronavirus epidemics are caused by coronavirus "unmasking" the toxicity of long-term pollution. The examples given are described as long-term pollution.

This fictional and complicated view gives Medicine much leverage in argument. Medicine can endlessly spin BS about coronavirus, as seen on CNN, Washington Post, NY Times, and all Mainstream Media. And like Bush/Bigtree, they admit the air pollution factor.

The coronavirus epidemics are caused by pollution.

Coronavirus  deadly infection
works with long-term pollution 

and thereby “reveals” areas of long-term pollution.

These areas are called
coronavirus epicenters. 

Intense short-term air pollution
compounds the toxicity of long-term pollution 

and thereby reveals areas of long-term pollution.

These areas are falsely called
coronavirus epicenters. 

Bush/Bigtree are recasting the Mainstream Media view, using the virus concept to avoid the topic of short-term air pollution as an epidemic trigger.

They are replacing the short-term pollution trigger with "coronavirus".

My research confronts the topic of short-term air pollution as trigger by properly dismissing coronavirus from the start. 

The global oil refinery regulation system triggered the epidemics by increasing waste dumping into the fuel and air stream.

These distinctions are important.

Bush/Bigtree are recasting Mainstream Medical views as if they were Dissident views.

Like the Mainstream, they avoid the topic of short-term pollution by focusing on a fictional virus. They ensure, like the Mainstream, the distortion of environmental studies. They ensure endless arguments about the disease-causing role of a virus vs environment.

Some believe Bush/Bigtree are saying that pollution is causing the epidemics, however, that is not what they are saying. They are promoting the idea of virus/pollution synergy, despite simple documented evidence of coronavirus existence missing.

Bush/Bigtree appear shockingly Dissident, caring beautiful people, however, they are mirroring the Mainstream view. This contrasts with my research.

Bush/Bigtree ensure the continuation of fraudulent analyses and data. By dramatizing coronavirus, they are maintaining irresolution of the entire repressive and debilitating political and legislative games associated with coronavirus, e.g., masks, germ phobia, contact tracing, etc.

The Bush/Bigtree interview, below, is falsely titled, as Bush did not "predict" the coronavirus disease epidemics.

My research, in contrast, does not allow Medicine any wiggle room in debate. They are already dead in the water.

Bigtree has long recast Mainstream views as Dissident views, and his most successful job was his production of the film "Vaxxed" for Andrew Wakefield (the "disgraced doctor"). 

Wakefield was earlier made famous as a fake Medical Martyr through the forced retraction of his measles/autism study, published in The Lancet. There, he covered up the toxicity aspects of autism with measles virus fictions. This method is used again, as the coronavirus coverup of the toxic coronavirus epidemic trigger. See details:


Sources

Zach Bush, interviewed by Del Bigtree, May 8th, 2020.
"The Doctor Who Predicted COVID-19 Answers All"
[Bush did not predict such]
Go to 40 minute mark for the virus/pollution discussion:

"Air pollution is the cause" (Zack Bush/Del Bigtree, extract of May 8 interview)
__________________________

Disclaimer: The author is not an authority or professional. For medical advice, see a trusted professional without delay. All statements are hypotheses for discussion. Constructive criticism is welcome.

Fair Use Act Disclaimer.
This site is for discussion purposes only.
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

Intellectual Property Rights
The intellectual property aggregated and redistributed in this site is for educational use only and is considered protected by standards of fair use. Intellectual property owners have been cited where possible. Original material produced for this site is copyright Jim West / harvoa, All rights reserved.

Please support this work by sharing, buying booksor donating.

Wednesday, July 15, 2020

EMF Anecdotes

by Jim West (please share and cite)

Introduction

"EMF" means electromagnetic fields. For the purpose of discussion, I limit its meaning to industrial EMF, which is polarized, often consisting of square waves. These properties make it much more hazardous than natural EMF such as sunlight, which is beneficial. We and our evolutionary ancestors have evolved along with natural EMF for at least billions of years. WHO absolutely instructs doctors to avoid the topic of EMF disease causation. See EMF Quick Summary

Anecdotes

EMF in remote mountains (8/12/2020)

High in the mountains near Tucson, I moved from NYC to escape air pollution and EMF. I found fresh air, yeah!

EMF was less than in NYC, but still present because of routers and video cameras in my building. 

Solution: Sleep in the mountains on Federal remote land.

Result: A disaster due to "stray voltage".

According to the great EMF epidemiologist, Sam Milham, MD, everywhere in the US, utilities are running return current through the earth. Not so in Europe.

This is strong enough to torture ecosystems in the earth and on it and even above it. I'm the proof. Farmers have been successfully litigating against utility companies, but nature has no lawyers, and campers are not wise enough.

A friend died of a heart attack while in the remote desert. A mystery until now.

I slept five nights in mountains, fearing puma, jaguars, panthers, javelina, and rattlesnakes. 

EMF was my nemesis: I should have known the first morning, when upon waking to severe muscle cramps. I could not believe it and returned four more nights. It was an adventure setting up my great bug tent. Aside from the EMF, a great adventure, with beautiful skies and watching birds catching bugs.

All that predation in nature I gazed upon every night. But they say, if you look around and don't see that sucker, you're the sucker. It was me. Industry was eating me alive, by running its return line through the earth, rather than through a cable. 

Very bitter. Friends have no idea and can't share my concern. Even on my EMF forum, all seemed aghast, but most had no idea this could be in remote areas. However, I have sensitive symptom perception, carefully avoiding all symptom suppressors, such as, caffeine, alcohol, and drugs. I abate EMF wherever possible.

Arthritic woman 8/11/2020

I visited a female friend (age 60) at her house. She had been limping for years. I diplomatically informed her that her health issues were due to EMF, i.e., the switchmode transformers in her LED and CFL lights and her dimmer switch.

She replied, "That makes sense because I cannot be in a commercial store, with its lighting, for more than 20 minutes."

I suggested that she buy simple non-dimming halogen lights.

I thought we were done, that she had enough evidence for her. She said she cannot go into a store because of the lights. Yet, she said she might take my message on "faith".

She said she didn't like doctors and that she didn't take any pharmaceuticals. Later she says that she is taking hormonal supplements. I said that those are not natural hormones, that they were like pharmaceuticals, often synthetic. They are pharmaceuticals.

Even if these supplements were "natural" extracts, they would not be on par with her own hormones because those have evolved from her body and it's needs. Hormones are like liquid nerves, with memory and the ability to appropriately manipulate body function behavior. I have known a few women who were taking hormonal therapy and blood thinners, and even from natural sources, only later to have their hip bones crack as they aged, requiring surgery and hazardous anesthesia.

Drugs addict the body, but they also addict the mind to propaganda. Once on drugs, people are fixed like a bug with a pin through it.

Electric stove 8/2/2020

Modern devices like TVs and stoves often never turn off. they constantly radiate EMF even when apparently off. They idle, with the power control circuit and transformers always ready. There is much EMF radiating when not in use, 24/7.

I went to a party recently and one of the guests was washing and cooking, standing for 25 minutes in front of an electric stove, not in use. The sink was across from this stove.

The guest left the stove and walked across the room. Suddenly his hand cramps up, the "worst" he has ever seen. In pain, bent over, sitting on the floor, it took him a while to recover. His exact location, as he walked across the room, was a two feet in front of the central A/C unit closet. He had apparently reached an EMF threshold near the stove.

There was no internet router in the house. The house had only a few electric devices, the stove, the refrigerator, an unplugged TV and central A/C. The stove and refrigerator had been within a foot of this guest.

When I saw his hand cramped, it reminded me of the my hand cramp experiences in my prior apartment in NYC, with its high EMF. So I told him that his cramps were probably from the stove and refrigerator, then the A/C unit. This modern unit probably had digital power controls and transformers. No other cause could be seen or imagined at the site of his cramp symptoms. He wasn't entirely convinced of my observation, but he was intrigued. 

He already had a low symptom threshold, because his own home is highly EMF polluted: a smartmeter, router, modem, cables, and an adjacent neighbor's very high EMF source (unknown). He had previously complained of toothaches, an EMF symptom.

It is a good habit, whenever anything unusual happens, from a sneeze onward, to pause and look around. Where are you in relation to toxic sources? You will see environmental correlations.

Shielding a video camera in the hallway, 7/20/2020 [jw01]

With patient diplomacy, I got management to allow me to shield the video camera near my apartment. I cut four layers of heavy duty foil to size, and taped this to the camera and its antenna. I did not obstruct its communication direction, which was downward. It appears that foil too close to the antenna might cause it to dysfunction (I might be wrong and did not verify). EMF reduction was about 400x. This is a big win, where I could feel and measure this improvement.







Male, 63 years, 7/12/2020 [dc]

A long-time co-author and frenemy, died of cancer recently. He was completely into natural living and nutrition and lived in a low pollution area. He was a leading critic of germ theory. He interviewed me five times on her podcast and we had several articles published.

His blind spot was the hazards of EMF. He made a great living as a telecommunications consultant and so, due this serious conflict of interest, was in EMF denial, as he could never accept that EMF was a hazard. I complained that he did not read the studies I sent him. Though he was always otherwise cordial, somewhat objective and ready to civilly argue any point -- on EMF, he would not respond, except to say, one time, that he could not see how WiFi could possibly be a hazard.

Cancer is an obvious EMF symptom, because cancer is the result of accumulated damage to nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) and EMF readily damages nucleic acid.

Upon learning of his cancer, I offered to step him through an EMF education, detection and abatement process. It would be simple. Yet, he did not respond.

From his interviews online, he apparently rejected chemo, but was considering infrared sauna, an intense EMF source. That could have been his therapy. Another acquaintance of mine who used electric heating near her bed, acquired breast cancer after a winter of use.

As David neared his death, he credited various experts, some famous, like Dr. Andrew Kaufman, who were advising him on herbs and other treatments, but not addressing cause. Cancer was discussed as an external enemy requiring alternative treatment. 

He blogged about their advice, but never mentioned my advice despite our long acquaintance. He never mentioned EMF. I'm just demonstrating his tunnel vision. his denial. 

Read more of my anecdotes here, and you will see why such human disappointments are common, though nevertheless sad. Very strange here though, as my friend David was known for his patient, objective and conversational civility. It comes down to a conflict of interest as a Telecoms consultant. Conflicts of interest can put a person in a state of denial.


Male, 45 years [Aynot] 7/1/2020

JW: "Hello. How are you?"

He: "Horrible. Yesterday, I felt bad in my stomach area, and I went to the doctor. He told me I have cancer throughout here [passing his hand across his stomach]."

JW: "Do you have a computer and an Internet router?"

He: "No, just a router, on 24/7. I'm keeping it for a neighbor."

JW: "Do you have trouble sleeping, and nervous legs."

He: "Yes, I have great trouble trying to sleep. I am nervous and wake up, walking around, several times every night."

JW: "Your cancer could be caused by EMF, the router. Check this out on the Internet; many are talking about it. Many scientific studies. Doctors' are instructed not to deal with this topic, instructed by WHO. They dismiss it, calling it hypersensitivity and a mere psychological condition. But don't believe me. You can personally test these ideas by turning off your router before you go to sleep, and next time I see you, we'll talk."

He: "I am freaked out by the idea of these treatments. They are destructive, even carcinogenic. Wow. I'll check into this EMF stuff on the Internet."

JW: [A few days later I see him.] "How did you sleep?"

He: "Great! I had deep sleep first time in years." 

JW: "This could also be related to your cancer. Work on detection, shielding and distancing from EMF, and keep testing these ideas."

He: "I will."

We were both optimistic. I assume he saw the light and would ask his doctor for a delay, or discuss environmental cause with the doctor. 

Yet, from here on, he was friendly, superficially, but would not entertain a pragmatic conversation on the EMF topic. He would put me off.

I learned that he continued seeing his doctor, began chemotherapy, and found that his body was unable to tolerate the chemo. He is engaged in a Medical and nutritional regimen, a program to work himself into a healthier state where he can tolerate toxic chemo.

Alexis Carrel stated that cancer as an inflammatory response to toxic stress, thus not usually an enemy. It is the body and it is body language (symptoms) calling attention from the mind, from management, requesting focus, consideration, and energy. And so I feel sad and angry, that I am watching another tragedy play out.

Update 8/2/2020

I saw this man talking to another who said she had cancer and they were saying to each other, "We will beat this. We will fight this." The Medical clichés.

How can they fight their own immune systems? How can they fight something of which they don't understand the cause?

Update 1/23/2021

This guy, who spent the last two years with a router running 24/7 next to his bed -- and was diagnosed with stomach cancer -- who I told to turn off the router and he then got his first nights full sleep -- went ahead with doctors orders and chemo -- 

-- and now is waiting to die in a hospice.

A few months ago, I asked him how he was doing. He said in pain. I said that makes sense if you poison yourself every day. He said, I think you've got something there. But he could not stop going to the doctors.

If I had do do that over again, I might ask him for his doctor's name and talk to the doctor, but what the hell. He would probably be not tell me, citing privacy. The guy would not talk to me, once he started chemo, and whenever we  saw each other, he must have known what I was thinking. The doctors would likely blow me off with their BS. Maybe his tragedy is worth more as a "case study".


Male, 65 years, 11/1/2019 [MBfm]

One warm morning, I shopped at a farmers' market, then rested on a bench. Another shopper was walking by, our eyes met, and he walked over. Immediately, we began talking about one of my favorite topics, EMF hazards. He sat down.

He said, "I am an electrical engineer. I was disabled by EMF to the point where, to recover, I had to move into a remote rural area where there was no electrical exposure. That recovery took 1.5 years. I am OK now, and with care, can function without symptoms."

I replied, "I find that every building, every apartment, has Internet routers and power cables running through the walls, TV cables etc, and this makes it nearly impossible for me to sleep. But I survive with about $1,000 worth of shielding fabric, and I tape foil on the wall to shield EMF sources."

He said, "Ground the shielding or it can become saturated."

Me: "I don't trust the ground."

He: "You must move to the countryside."

I unfortunately stayed in my residence and worked with shielding. The location is great, and only now, after a year, am I finally frustrated enough to move. I have, though learned much about EMF shielding and have become skilled at.

Shielding thought 8/3/2020

It is said that distance is the best way to abate EMF.



This is true, but not always in terms of shielding. There is a saying. "Keep your enemies close."

Sometimes an unfriendly neighbor will place his router next to your bedroom wall. This puts the router 6 inches from you.

It might be worse to have the router 10 feet away. Less area needs to be shielded at the closer distance, though radiation level is higher.

With a good shielding material, or lots of it, this small area can be more predictable and manageable. A far distance will cast reflections of radiation around what would have to be a massive shield that covers the entire wall.

A large area of shielding also can reflect other EMF sources towards you, around your large area shield.

Up close, you can use, if necessary, 100 layers of heavy duty foil, might be able to more effectively shield a small area.

Any arguments against this thinking?

__________________________

Disclaimer: The author is not an authority or professional. For medical advice, see a trusted professional without delay. All statements are hypotheses for discussion. Constructive criticism is welcome.

Fair Use Act Disclaimer.
This site is for discussion purposes only.
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

Intellectual Property Rights
The intellectual property aggregated and redistributed in this site is for educational use only and is considered protected by standards of fair use. Intellectual property owners have been cited where possible. Original material produced for this site is copyright Jim West / harvoa, All rights reserved.

Please support this work by sharing, buying booksor donating.

Ultrasound book on Amazon's Best Seller List

  by Jim West   (please share and cite) My slam-dunk critical book on medical ultrasound is supported  by medicos, midwives, scientists, and...