Zach Bush, MD and Del Bigtree on COVID-19

by Jim West (please share and cite)

I separate myself from Zach Bush, MD and Del Bigtree, on the issue of coronavirus and pollution.

Coronavirus Epicenter Causation
Zach Bush & Del Bigtree	Jim West
Coronavirus is causing morbidity and mortality.	No documentation demonstrates the existence of a coronavirus . This argument is slam-dunk.
The coronavirus epidemics are caused by coronavirus "unmasking" the toxicity of long-term pollution. The examples given are described as long-term pollution. This fictional and complicated view gives Medicine much leverage in argument. Medicine can endlessly spin BS about coronavirus, as seen on CNN, Washington Post, NY Times, and all Mainstream Media. And like Bush/Bigtree, they admit the air pollution factor.	The coronavirus epidemics are caused by pollution.
Coronavirus  deadly infection works with long-term pollution  and thereby “reveals” areas of long-term pollution. These areas are called coronavirus epicenters.	Intense short-term air pollution compounds the toxicity of long-term pollution  and thereby reveals areas of long-term pollution. These areas are falsely called coronavirus epicenters.
Bush/Bigtree are recasting the Mainstream Media view, using the virus concept to avoid the topic of short-term air pollution as an epidemic trigger. They are replacing the short-term pollution trigger with "coronavirus".	My research confronts the topic of short-term air pollution as trigger by properly dismissing coronavirus from the start.  The global oil refinery regulation system triggered the epidemics by increasing waste dumping into the fuel and air stream.

These distinctions are important.

Bush/Bigtree are recasting Mainstream Medical views as if they were Dissident views.

Like the Mainstream, they avoid the topic of short-term pollution by focusing on a fictional virus. They ensure, like the Mainstream, the distortion of environmental studies. They ensure endless arguments about the disease-causing role of a virus vs environment.

Some believe Bush/Bigtree are saying that pollution is causing the epidemics, however, that is not what they are saying. They are promoting the idea of virus/pollution synergy, despite simple documented evidence of coronavirus existence missing.

Bush/Bigtree appear shockingly Dissident, caring beautiful people, however, they are mirroring the Mainstream view. This contrasts with my research.

Bush/Bigtree ensure the continuation of fraudulent analyses and data. By dramatizing coronavirus, they are maintaining irresolution of the entire repressive and debilitating political and legislative games associated with coronavirus, e.g., masks, germ phobia, contact tracing, etc.

The Bush/Bigtree interview, below, is falsely titled, as Bush did not "predict" the coronavirus disease epidemics.

My research, in contrast, does not allow Medicine any wiggle room in debate. They are already dead in the water.

Bigtree has long recast Mainstream views as Dissident views, and his most successful job was his production of the film "Vaxxed" for Andrew Wakefield (the "disgraced doctor"). 

Wakefield was earlier made famous as a fake Medical Martyr through the forced retraction of his measles/autism study, published in The Lancet. There, he covered up the toxicity aspects of autism with measles virus fictions. This method is used again, as the coronavirus coverup of the toxic coronavirus epidemic trigger. See details:

https://harvoa-med.blogspot.com/2019/08/wakefield.html

Sources

Zach Bush, interviewed by Del Bigtree, May 8th, 2020.

"The Doctor Who Predicted COVID-19 Answers All"

[Bush did not predict such]

Go to 40 minute mark for the virus/pollution discussion:

https://youtu.be/5RAtFBvKrVw

"Air pollution is the cause" (Zack Bush/Del Bigtree, extract of May 8 interview)

https://youtu.be/vv3hTAvAjrs

__________________________

Disclaimer: The author is not an authority or professional. For medical advice, see a trusted professional without delay. All statements are hypotheses for discussion. Constructive criticism is welcome.

Fair Use Act Disclaimer.

This site is for discussion purposes only.

Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

Intellectual Property Rights

The intellectual property aggregated and redistributed in this site is for educational use only and is considered protected by standards of fair use. Intellectual property owners have been cited where possible. Original material produced for this site is copyright Jim West / harvoa, All rights reserved.

Please support this work by sharing, buying books, or donating.