by Jim West (please share and cite)
A reasonable hypothesis...
Elon Musk's fate mirrors Steve Jobs' fate.
Elon's biographer is Walter Isaacson, the same biographer who authored Steve Jobs' biography.
Isaacson was the CEO of CNN, so he definitely understands Medical politics.
When he was 31, in 1983, he wrote a thriller about Medical heroes fighting HIV, "Hunting for the Hidden Killers". That was published by Time Magazine, where he was associate editor.
After Jobs died, Isaacson was interviewed on prime time "60 Minutes", where he extensively described Jobs as an "idiot" for trying to avoid mainstream cancer treatment.
I assume Isaacson will do the same thing to Musk, whom he already describes in interviews, as verbally violent, mentally "dark", and forgetful/silent re his abusive episodes.
Elon and Steve both work(ed) in EMF disaster-ville. We who are aware of EMF hazards (which are clearly documented), can attribute Jobs' cancer to EMF, as he lived 24/7 in the Apple corporate research facilities.
Similarly, Musk, the promoted genius, is immersed in EMF at Tesla facilities and in the car itself, which reviewers have found to be a high EMF environment.
Summing up: Musk suffers back disorders, obesity, violence, a dark mind, and asberger's syndrome. All of these disorders are evidence that he had an early start with prenatal X-rays.
Musk takes an injected drug to keep his weight down. Surgeons have implanted a titanium plate for structural support. Likely he is taking pain killers and psych drugs. We might assume reasonably, that he is doomed. He is notoriously in denial over EMF and EV vehicles.
All this correlates with EMF symptoms. (The mainstream considers this questionable, though to me, the medical mainstream is usually dissembling). Bioinitiative.org and SmartGridAwareness.org are good EMF refs.
Appearing on the near future, is the revelation that he is not actually handsome. Watch for Elon's cancer headlines. Maybe his dimples will survive.
The electric car industry is lately taking a media hit as a "scam" etc, and Musk's downfall health-wise will need an explanation. Isaacson can handle that to protect industrial interest. Already, before publication of the Must biography, he has described Musk as violent, unstable and "dark".
The recent media EV put down is probably a temporary adjustment of public perception, partially to churn the $65 trillion dollar investment market.
Nevertheless, new battery and solar panel tech should save the EV, though present tech is inadequate. Battery tech will further damage the planet's environment. EV's will not reduce petroleum consumption much if at all, since they are only about 15% of the petroleum market.
____________________________________________
Please support this work by sharing, buying books, or donating.
